Peer Review Process
%
My Stats
Current Streak
/ 5
Tokens
Lifetime Tokens
Accuracy
%
User ID
Home
Quest
Answered
Saved
Hot Topics
Following
Followers
Post
Create
Promote
1
Comments
Money
Account
Please select a topic from the list.
Out of Tokens! Answer 5 in a row to earn more tokens
European History
Organic Chemistry
Muscle Physiology
Football (Soccer)
Optical Measurement Techniques
Oceanography
Banking and Finance
Muscular System
Renaissance Art and Architecture
Biochemistry
American Political History
Nuclear Physics
Crop Farming
International Relations
Nuclear Non-Proliferation
Atomic Structure
Cardiology
Skyscraper Design
Academic Publishing
Cruise Tourism
Greek Mythology
Photography
Reproductive Health
States of Matter
Anatomy
Solar Energy
Ancient Writing Systems
Natural Wonders
Photography Equipment
Medieval History
S
Steve
➕ Follow Author
📄 View Journals
>>
Followers:
0
Lifetime Tokens:
0
ACADEMIC PUBLISHING
Peer Review Process
Double-Blind Review
Double-blind review reshapes academic fairness by hiding identities on both sides
5 Feb 2026
0
What is the primary purpose of double-blind review in academic publishing?
To speed up the publication process by eliminating reviewer comments
To allow authors to know who reviewed their work for direct feedback
To reduce bias by concealing the identities of both authors and reviewers
×
Comments
Loading....
Share comment
5
Streak Win!
Game Over